Items(s) added to your cart
Your cart is empty
Continue Shopping

9 Hallmarks of Aging: Genomic Instability


Aging is a complex and multifaceted process, and scientists have identified nine key hallmarks that contribute to it. These hallmarks range from the accumulation of damaged DNA to changes in how our cells communicate. In our ongoing series, we delve into each of these aspects to understand aging better. Today, we focus on one crucial hallmark: genomic instability.

Genomic instability refers to the increased frequency of mutations within the DNA of our cells as we age. Our DNA is the blueprint of life, carrying instructions for everything from our hair color to our susceptibility to certain diseases. Over time, various factors, such as environmental toxins and metabolic processes, can damage this DNA. In our youth, our bodies are adept at repairing these damages. However, as we grow older, the efficiency of these repair mechanisms declines, leading to an accumulation of DNA damage – this is genomic instability.

But why is genomic instability significant in the context of aging? The accumulation of DNA damage is not just a marker of aging; it actively contributes to it. When our DNA is damaged, our blueprint required for normal function becomes damaged and can lead to malfunctioning cells. These cells can then either die prematurely or replicate uncontrollably, leading to diseases like cancer. Additionally, damaged DNA can trigger a chronic inflammatory response, which has been linked to various age-related diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s disease.

Understanding genomic instability is crucial in the quest to mitigate the effects of aging. By studying how and why our DNA gets damaged and finding ways to enhance our body’s ability to repair this damage, we can potentially slow down the aging process and reduce the risk of age-related health conditions.

Reference: López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194-1217. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039